Skip to main content

Effective Evidence Reporting PRKS 3140

Parks Course

International Fees

International fees are typically three times the amount of domestic fees. Exact cost will be calculated upon completion of registration.

Course details

This course focuses on taking effective statements; the Judge Rules for statements; admissability of evidence; and effective evidence reporting.

Prerequisite(s)

  • No prerequisites are required for this course.

Credits

2.0

Not offered this term
This course is not offered this term. Please check back next term or subscribe to receive notifications of future course offerings and other opportunities to learn more about this course and related programs.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, the student will be able to:

Module 1 - Effective Statements

  • Define Statement as it relates to a person suspected of committing an offence or involvement in an incident, or to the witness of an incident.
  • Define inculpatory and exculpatory statements giving examples of each.
  • List two reasons statements should be used by investigators.
  • List two changes that will affect the use of statements and the statement taker directly, as a result of legislative changes and high court rulings.

Module 2 - Model Statements

  • List in the proper sequence, nine components or parts of a typical statement.
  • Provide two reasons why the Charter of Rights Notice must be given to arrested or detained persons before taking a statement.
  • Provide the most recent definition of detained as interpreted by the higher courts.
  • Explain why the POLICE WARNING must be given to a suspect before taking a statement.
  • Describe four different methods of recording information from a statement giver.
  • List two advantages and two disadvantages of each of the above methods.

Module 3 -Admissibility

  • Define:
    • A person in authority.
    • The IBRAHIM rule.
  • Explain why some inducements will render a statement inadmissible.
  • Provide at least three examples of inducements that would probably render a statement inadmissible.
  • Explain how to remove any minor inducements that were previously involved.
  • Define a 'Voir dire' including information about potential witnesses for Voir dire and anticipated questions related to statements involved.
  • List three types of statements/testimonies that are inadmissible in courtroom proceedings.

Module 4 - Guidelines and Judges' Rules

  • Describe the 'Judges' Rules' as they relate to statements and Canadian Law.
  • List at least three of the original 'Judges' Rules' (1912/18) and three of the revised 'Judges' Rules' (1964).
  • List four guidelines for taking statements with a brief outline of each one.

Effective as of Fall 2003

Subscribe

Interested in being notified about future offerings of Effective Evidence Reporting (PRKS 3140)? If so, fill out the information below and we'll notify you by email when courses for each new term are displayed here.

  • Privacy Notice: The information you provide will be used to respond your request for BCIT course information and is collected under Section 26(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). For more information about BCIT’s privacy practices contact: Associate Director, Privacy, Information Access & Policy Management, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Ave. Burnaby, BC V5A 3H2, email: privacy@bcit.ca.